------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-15 23:30 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] -static-libgcc links in libunwind.so.7
hjl at lucon dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-12-15 22:54 > ------- > We tried very hard to provide -static-libgcc which links against > libgcc.a and libgcc_eh.a instead of libgcc.a and libgcc_s.so.1. > The main purpose of -static-libgcc is to link in the copy of > the unwind stuff. Introduction of libunwind moved the unwind > stuff from libgcc_s.so.1/libgcc_eh.a into libunwind.so.7/libunwind.a. > With libunwind, -static-libgcc should still link in the copy of > the unwind stuff, instead of from a shared library. Otherwise, > applications which expect that behavior of -static-libgcc won't > work correctly. OK. I understand now that your patch is just modifying the static linking case. In that case, your change is OK. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18153
