------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2004-12-08 20:28
-------
Subject: Re: New: missed SRA of a block copy
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> The following function:
> int f(int a)
> {
> int i = a & -129;
> return i == 144;
> }
> Should be compiled to:
> int f1(int a)
> {
> return (a & -129) == 144; // aka return 0;
> }
>
> Yes this shows up in real code (gcc), found while testing out my tree
> combiner.
>
Hmm? What does SRA have to do with anything here?
Diego.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18892
