https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127477
Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No in this case, gcc is correct. The lifetime of only the base class has
started inside the base class constructor. The full lifetime has not started.
