https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127352
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Slightly cleaned up testcase:
_BitInt(65) a, b, c;
__int128 d;
_BitInt(7) e;
long foo (long x) { return x; }
_BitInt(13) bar (unsigned x, _BitInt(3) y) { return y == 0 ? : x; }
_BitInt(65) baz (_BitInt(65) x, _BitInt(5) y) { return y == 0 ? x : y; }
_BitInt(5)
qux ()
{
_BitInt(47) f;
unsigned g = d & 15;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < g; i++)
{
switch (a)
{
case 0:
b = 0;
case 8:
e = 0;
break;
case 10:
long h = g;
f = ~foo (~h);
e = f;
}
if (0 >= b)
continue;
for (unsigned j = 0; j < 1; j++)
b = (_BitInt(7)) (0 >= d ? bar (e, a) : 0);
e = c ? baz (b, i) : 0;
}
return b;
}