https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126964
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
TL;DR: these change likely regress on a 32-bit target.
A quick look at the commit above, r17-3967-gd6c3e489d368da, suggests that the
edits to the testsuite (as opposed to the code edits) are responsible for these
two regressions for cris-elf:
*** regress-98 (f: 252, p: 61044) gcc fc0a5c0d04a5..d6c3e489d368 cris-elf
2026-09-07-01:04:14 pchp1, log at /mnt/auto_r\
epos/hp/checkout/gcc_latest/logfile.d6c3e489d368.2026-09-07-01:04:14
--- regress.prev 2026-09-07 01:43:14.000000000 +0200
+++ regress 2026-09-07 07:55:26.923110316 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
gcc.sum gcc.target/cris/pr93372-2.c
+gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/c_loc_test_22.f90
+gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/class_to_type_9.f90
libstdc++.sum 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc
The size-type-related changes is a major hint. Without investigating further,
I just suggest that the changes in this PR be tested on any 32-bit target.
