------- Additional Comments From rleigh at debian dot org 2004-11-29 23:50 ------- Sorry about the renaming.
Even though you aren't supposed to intermix std::cout and std::wcout, surely it would be nicer if the undefined behaviour was the same whichever you used first? Currently: std::cout, std::wcout ==> wcout is garbled std::wcout, std::cout ==> cout is silently discarded If it would discard the invalid stream in either order, it would at least be predictable. Thanks, Roger -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18678
