https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126084
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #9) > There's an unfortunate side effect of this patch: it introduces > __asan_report_load_* calls in bitintlower1, before asan1. They'd normally > only be introduced in sanopt, long after asan. When asan1 sees these > noreturn calls, it introduces undesirable __asan_handle_no_return calls > before them. So I think we should just special case those in asan pass and don't add those __asan_handle_no_return calls before them.
