https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126155
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I could make an argument that the default should be as minimal as possible > precisely to allow for its reuse in custom (extended) implementations, but I > trust there's reasons for why it's done this way. Certainly a valid argument, but probably not strong enough to justify breaking backward compatibility at this point.
