https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126042
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > (In reply to Drea Pinski from comment #3) > > (In reply to Drea Pinski from comment #2) > > > But really combine_comparisons should be used. But that returns a tree. I > > > am > > > going to change it to return a tree_code. > > > > I have to figure out the best tree code to use for constant values of true > > and false. I am thinking MIN_EXPR (false) and MAX_EXPR (true). > > Alternate return value? > > tree_code combine_comparisons (..., tree *res) > > where *res is a known result if any? Possibly INTEGER_CST as tree_code return value in that case?
