------- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2004-11-24 00:33 ------- Subject: Re: gfortran: CONJG: false error message about standard violation
sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot > edu 2004-11-22 04:19 ------- > Toon, > > I take it back. The code as written is correct. Now you know why I want to have it reviewed :-( However, your data point is interesting. Perhaps the point where the decision "is this a Fortran XX intrinsic" is made at the wrong point. conjg(double complex) obviously is correct Fortran 95 (when double complex is a "typedef" of COMPLEX(8)), but dconjg is not a correct specific intrinsic. Thanks for looking into this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18565
