https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124439
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #4) > > So when deleting insn 11 we assume that all uses will be replaced. The way > it's written, I suppose that's a basic assumption of lra. > > Yes, that is right. Although there is an exception like reverse memory equivalence. So the original patch for PR124041 was wrong. It was my mistake that I approved it. I'll work on the original PR124041 to fix it and this PR.
