https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110196
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to [email protected] from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > I am trying to understand the issue here? > > Is what you are asking is that the " at :0" should not be printed out? Or > > the issue is the source line cannot be found. > > The issue is, that the origin library, in this case libc.so/gtk.so/glib.so > is not shown. In all other lines, xournalpp as executable is missing. The executable name isn't supposed to be shown there, what's missing is a filename. I'm confused what this bug report is actually about, the missing filenames in the "at :0" output, or not showing the binary where the symbol comes from? Did you change your mind about what you're actually asking for? The missing filename is a bug, but not showing the binary is expected and would be an enhancement request.
