https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122005

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>And yet it doesn't recognize the `(x > 0) && (x & (x - 1) == 0)` idiom above 
>and optimize accordingly, hence this feature request.


Yes this part is a dup of bug 94787.



>so I can't tell which version is better.

It depends on if the branch is predictable.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 94787 ***

Reply via email to