https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121705
Nathaniel Shead <nshead at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Nathaniel Shead <nshead at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Fixed. It's worth noting that due to how the language behaves this is still somewhat fragile; if we never have a non-dependent use of the operators exposed from the purview then they'll be discarded and the error will return. If that happens perhaps even a non-exported 'using' in the module purview would suffice to fix the issue.