https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121304
--- Comment #2 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > tree-vect- stmts.cc:2222:8: runtime error: load of value 3026314944, which is > not a valid value for type 'vect_memory_access_type' > #0 0x556ebb877e42 in get_group_load_store_type > /usr/src/debug/sys-devel/gcc-16.0.9999/gcc-16.0.9999/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc: > 2222 /* As a last resort, trying using a gather load or scatter store. ??? Although the code can handle all group sizes correctly, it probably isn't a win to use separate strided accesses based on nearby locations. Or, even if it's a win over scalar code, it might not be a win over vectorizing at a lower VF, if that allows us to use contiguous accesses. */ if ((*memory_access_type == VMAT_ELEMENTWISE || *memory_access_type == VMAT_STRIDED_SLP) && !STMT_VINFO_GATHER_SCATTER_P (stmt_info) /* <<<<<< */ && single_element_p && SLP_TREE_LANES (slp_node) == 1 && loop_vinfo && vect_use_strided_gather_scatters_p (stmt_info, vectype, loop_vinfo, masked_p, gs_info, elsvals)) *memory_access_type = VMAT_GATHER_SCATTER;