https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121059
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Mon, 14 Jul 2025, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121059 > > Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > Known to work| |14.3.0 > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > Known to fail| |15.1.0 > Last reconfirmed| |2025-07-14 > Keywords| |needs-bisection > > --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Sam James from comment #4) > > (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > > > Created attachment 61857 [details] > > > reduced.i > > > > > > bisecting > > > > r16-2088-ge9079e4f43d135 but given my luck with going back further in the > > other bug, I won't bother here > > `-O3 -march=x86-64-v4 --param vect-partial-vector-usage=1` ICEs for GCC 15.1.0 > also. But works in GCC 14.3.0. It's good we get some more coverage for masked epilogue vect now, but yeah - this was expected to some extent ...
