https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120948
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c |tree-optimization
Keywords| |missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So you say that we fail to optimize
int foo (unsigned x)
{
unsigned tem = 1/x;
if (x == 0)
return 5;
return tem;
}
because we turn 1/x into x == 1?
A phase ordering issue, obviously. Relevant in practice? I'm not sure.