https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104102
Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ideally the frame address walking code in riscv.cc is given an RTX for the
appropriate frame and we just need to generate code to extract the return
address from the proper offset. If that is the case, then it might be a good
task for a junior engineer.
The worry is that the offset of the return address may not be as consistent as
we'd like. So that needs to be kept in mind.
Clearly we'll need testcases. There's a couple in the s390 port directory that
could probably be adjusted for RISC-V.
Anyway, assigning to myself to eventually hand off to a junior engineer.
