------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-18 13:22 ------- Might I propose we don't deal with this as an enhancement request but as a "normal" bug? Killing the jump threader in cfgcleanup.c would be a mighty feat, it's one of the slowest parts of the cfgcleanup on RTL (and IIRC it's one of the quadratic bottleneckt).
Otherwise, perhaps I should (have) add(ed) the compile time hog keyword... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18046
