https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119267
Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed| |2025-06-21
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC's does not look into the string for an inline asm; it has no way of knowing
any semantic information about what the inline asm does beyond the state
specified in the inputs/output/clobbers section.
The RVV specification is more dynamic than any that GCC has had to deal with
before and some aspects still don't work as well as we'd like. LMUL and
dynamic adjustment of LMUL being one such area.
If you want assembly level like control of code generation, then probably the
way to go is the RVV intrinsic route.
