[Bug middle-end/120692] Copying of adjacent fields can be merged when there is padding

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120692

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|                            |aarch64
            Version|unknown                     |16.0

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
But is this OK with the C++ memory model?  Does it work when you add another
void * field after 'index' (no tail-padding to be re-used)?