https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120615
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No, absolutely not. This is a required part of the C++17 standard.
Libc++ is replacing the contents of the pstl directory with its own
re-implementation developed within libc++. The only way we could replace it is
if we developed our own libstdc++ equivalent and there are no resources (and no
reason or desire) to do that.
In any case, the llvm copy of pstl is not the original upstream. There is a
newer version of the code at
https://github.com/uxlfoundation/oneDPL/tree/main/include/oneapi/dpl/pstl
