https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120504
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Importance isn't actually a field, it's the combination of Priority and > Severity. And severity is pretty much ignored, and priority is set according > to clear rules, so I see no harm in assuming that the RMs will give P1 to a > gcc-16 regression. Yes, I meant to write Severity. And I don't think that "blocker" or "critical" severity settings are ignored though.
