https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120083
--- Comment #4 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- By the way Andrew, wouldn't it be more performant to check for sNaN then use vcvtneps2bf16 instead of completely avoiding vcvtneps2bf16?
mcccs at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs Sat, 03 May 2025 14:16:48 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120083
--- Comment #4 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- By the way Andrew, wouldn't it be more performant to check for sNaN then use vcvtneps2bf16 instead of completely avoiding vcvtneps2bf16?