https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120029
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Actually it looks like we can make it optimally efficient without any difficulty: --- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_path.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_path.cc @@ -914,6 +914,10 @@ path::operator+=(const path& p) _Cmpt* last = nullptr; if (p._M_type() == _Type::_Multi) { + // For p += p we reallocate now, to avoid dangling pointers later. + if (&p == this) [[unlikely]] + _M_cmpts.reserve(2 * _M_cmpts.size()); + it = p._M_cmpts._M_impl->begin(); last = p._M_cmpts._M_impl->end(); }