https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119987
Alejandro Colomar <alx at kernel dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alx at kernel dot org
--- Comment #2 from Alejandro Colomar <alx at kernel dot org> ---
Plan9 extensions (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> s/-fms-extensions/-fplan9-extensions/ ?
I think MS extensions are a subset of Plan9 ones (or maybe two sets with some
intersection, I don't know). We shouldn't move the entire set of Plan9
extensions to GNU, as some of them are dangerous. See also:
<https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119481>
>
> The first step is move that extension to its own option rather than being
> controlled by a meta one.
Yep, that could be a good first step. How about -ftagged-unnamed-member (or
conversely -funnamed-tagged-member)? It would allow specifying members (of
unions or structures) with a tagged union or structure type, but with no member
name.
