https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101440
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore <san...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4590a31f81ae18e0d887c1a56f510d22754f31ed commit r15-9165-g4590a31f81ae18e0d887c1a56f510d22754f31ed Author: Sandra Loosemore <sloosem...@baylibre.com> Date: Thu Apr 3 02:40:59 2025 +0000 Doc: Clarify use of access attribute [PR101440] This issue was specifically about a confusing mention of the "second and third arguments to the memcpy function" when only the second one is a pointer affected by the attribute, but reading through the entire discussion I found other things confusing as well; e.g. in some cases it wasn't clear whether the "arguments" were the arguments to the attribute or the function, or exactly what a "positional argument" was. I've tried to rewrite that part to straighten it out, as well as some light copy-editing throughout. gcc/ChangeLog PR c/101440 * doc/extend.texi (Common Function Attributes): Clean up some confusing language in the description of the "access" attribute.
