https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119481

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #6)
> But maybe I should say (part of) this extension is quite dangerous,
> regardless of it violating the standard.

So don't use the option to enable the extensions then.

> And it would allow using the extension in new code, in ways that are not
> dangerous.

It seems like what you want is a way to enable individual extensions from the
plan9 set. Then the existing -fplan9-extensions option will still enable them
all, as it's designed to do. But code that wants to use one or two of those
extensions, not all, can select that instead.

Reply via email to