https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118981
--- Comment #51 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Erich Löw from comment #50) > Q_1 > What would happen if saying (just hypothetically) > --> All prios in range 0 ... 2^^16 - 1 are allowed > --> Imho consequence of removing split in reserved and not-reserved prios. It would be impossible for the compiler and standard library to safely implement the requirements of the C++ standard. There's a reason we have a reserved range that user code is not allowed to use. If users were allowed to use 1-101 then we'd need to reserve negative values for the standard library to use. > Q_2 > Without usage of [[gnu::init_priority(xxxxx)].... to what prio maps it? See Bug 65115
