https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118940
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note I suspect using C with some (generic) builtins might be faster than what the inline-asm could provide these days than the inline-asm that was used. Plus I doubt the speed of big-int would ever be the bottle neck speed of ipxe because the network will always be the bottle neck. So I wonder why they optimized this code in the first place 13 years ago.
