https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
          Component|tree-optimization           |target
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED

--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So if we add:
            if ((rand() & 1))
             arr[i] *= -1;

For the initialization loop. 

And increase the 2D size from 256 to 1000 (this part is important).
The difference between path splitting vs non path splitting is:
0.646 (ifcvt) vs 0.676 (split path)

Which means then ifcvt is faster. 

So it is just a bad benchmark.
I will submit the changes I found for the trapping case later today though.

Reply via email to