https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118597
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > It will need less strict pattern matching, likely just the SSA names used > changed (I also have the opinion -raw dumps should be removed, so try to > not rely on those). > > Not a missed opt I'm 99% sure, just a bogus test. Oh that makes sense, I didn't look into the full testcase to see what was going on.
