https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82142
--- Comment #2 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- On trunk, the codegen looks optimal now (surely Jakub's changes in PR116416).
sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Wed, 22 Jan 2025 21:19:38 -0800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82142
--- Comment #2 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- On trunk, the codegen looks optimal now (surely Jakub's changes in PR116416).