https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118500
--- Comment #7 from Alejandro Colomar <alx at kernel dot org> --- (In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #6) > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) > > Thanks for filing this report. > > You're welcome! :-) > > > > > There are (at least) three -fanalyzer issues here: > > > > (a) false positive about leak of 'my_strdup("f,oo")': > > https://godbolt.org/z/rKxhfxWGf > > This is probably due to -fanalyzer getting confused by having both the > > attribute and a function body. I think there's already a report about this > > in BZ somewhere. > > > > (b) -fanalyzer doesn't "know" about the behavior of strsep beyond "knowing" > > that it doesn't malloc or free anything internally. Hence it doesn't know > > that it will advance s to a point within the buffer that's not the start > > (and hence the later "free" is a bug). > > Agree. On the other hand, I think fnalayzer shouldn't get fancy into learning about strsep(3), because then it won't be able to analyze all the other functions that modify a pointer. I think it should instead assume that a T** modifies the pointer value (as opposed to a const T**).