https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116068
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 14 Jan 2025, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116068 > > Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > So shall we go for something like: > --- gcc/cgraphunit.cc 2025-01-02 11:23:03.119703892 +0100 > +++ gcc/cgraphunit.cc 2025-01-14 12:23:41.918872660 +0100 > @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ symbol_table::process_new_functions (voi > { > cgraph_node *node = cgraph_new_nodes[i]; > fndecl = node->decl; > + bitmap_obstack_initialize (NULL); > switch (state) > { > case CONSTRUCTION: > @@ -367,6 +368,7 @@ symbol_table::process_new_functions (voi > gcc_unreachable (); > break; > } > + bitmap_obstack_release (NULL); > } > > cgraph_new_nodes.release (); > > ? All the other spots that execute some pass list in cgraphunit.cc wrap that > with bitmap_obstack_initialize/release. That looks correct to me.
