https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118431
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |21093
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Now GCC should be able to do better at tail calls in general, see PR 21093 for
an example.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21093
[Bug 21093] missed tail call optimization when local address could escape