https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118412

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to André Brand from comment #3)
> That's interesting. 
> This example is copied word for word from the standard section
> [temp.mem.enum](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.mem.enum):
> https://godbolt.org/z/no6z7WT5s
> ... but all major compilers seem to reject it.

https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.expl.spec#example-4 says it should be rejected.

Looks like this should be fixed up again :).

Reply via email to