https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118032
--- Comment #36 from Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #35) > Shall we close this bug or keep it open for implementing greedy switch > clustering for jump tables as suggested in comment #29 ? I think that it would be better to open a new bug report for this -- so I did that. See pr118353. If I understand correctly, the build time has gone back to the original numbers and we can close this bug, right? Btw thank you all for dealing with this and sorry I couldn't be as active as I'd like recently.
