https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118303
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #6) > BTW, why component ipa? Takling to myself again: the two linked PR:s have component ipa. That may be correct for those PR:s, but rather than designating this PR ipa, IMHO it speaks for splitting up this PR into a set of different PR:s.
