https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118243
Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=108384
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14/15 Regression]
|Incorrect behaviour of |Incorrect behaviour of
|complex types with -O3 |complex types with -O3
| |since
| |r13-5681-ge8109bd87766be
--- Comment #5 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> It looks like some bad interaction between IPA SRA, IPA CP and function
> splitting. But that as far as I can tell. Maybe the bisection can say
> something more.
r13-5681-ge8109bd87766be with your testcase
