https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118097
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > ... ditto the original. So maybe fixed already? I think not. I just checked today's gcc trunk and the problem seems to still exist in the original code. The git range specified is 43 commits, so shouldn't be too hard to bisect.
