https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118070
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > But the rest still applies, we'd need to define what the other endianity > _BitInt ABI is for each target supporting _BitInt. And given that different > architectures can have different _BitInt layout ABIs, SSO wouldn't really > achieve data exchangeability between those. What leeway do you have on the layout of _BitInts though? Are the constraints coming from straightforward equivalences for power-of-2 lengths not sufficient to prescribe one (almost) entirely, if you put aside PDP-11 nonsense?
