https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117964
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- > Am 09.12.2024 um 16:51 schrieb hubicka at ucw dot cz > <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117964 > > --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> --- >> r5-1621-gfc56f9d2843266 last moved the pass earlier > Doing kind of a fake "PHI" basic block to factor out the edges is > possible and perhaps a good idea which I did not think of while working > on orgiinal CFG code. We would need to adapt passes after computed goto > duplication to understand this, which may involve some machine dependent > surprises, but hopefully not too many. Maybe have some Standard UNSPEC Jump that is a no-op but makes CFG consumers happy? > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
