[Bug testsuite/117494] pr101145inf.c fails on RISC-V without V extension (and maybe other architectures with a CPU lacking vector extension)

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117494

--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski <pins...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0dc389f21bfd4ee49d57bcfaa1d1936456c55e48

commit r15-5377-g0dc389f21bfd4ee49d57bcfaa1d1936456c55e48
Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
Date:   Sun Nov 17 13:40:22 2024 -0800

    testsuite: Fix pr101145inf*.c testcases [PR117494]

    Instead of doing a dg-run with a specific target check for linux.
    Use signal as the effective-target since this requires the use
    of ALARM signal to do the testing.
    Also use check_vect in the main and renames main to main1 to make sure
    we don't use the registers.

    Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.

            PR testsuite/117494
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * gcc.dg/vect/pr101145inf.c: Remove dg-do and replace
            with dg-require-effective-target of signal.
            * gcc.dg/vect/pr101145inf_1.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/vect/pr101145inf.inc: Rename main to main1
            and mark as noinline.
            Include tree-vect.h. Have main call check_vect and main1.

    Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>