https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116634
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Horse Radi from comment #3)
> This code has been working all the way back from gcc 9 till 13, only
> breaking in gcc 14.
Yes, but that was a bug, an array needs to be initialized with {}. But it
seems reasonable to me for the (correct, but new) diagnostic to be a pedwarn
rather than a hard error.
> There is also a frozen library for constexpr strings
> that uses similar methods.
In a quick look at frozen I'm not seeing a similar pattern.
> The compilation error shows a clear inconsistency in the compiler. The
> lengths are correctly inferred, but the first string argument is skipped.
That's a red herring; the argument is being passed normally, just the
diagnostic context printing is getting it wrong.
Marek, will you adjust the diagnostic for this case?
