https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550
--- Comment #24 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #23) > (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #22) > > Unfortunately, one of them [lra-pr116550-2.c} is failing > > with the patch and -mlra, whereas is passes with -mno-lra. > > Ok, I messed that one up. That test also fails with -mlra and without the > patch. > > Closing this one as fixed. I'm in the process of analyzing lra-pr116550-2.c (or simd-r.c as I call it first). The real wrong things happened in dse2 pass. The dse2 pass made a wrong elimination of a few store insns. Right now I can't say if it is the lra derived bug or a clean dse2 bug. Johann do you think that it is better to open a new bug for lra-pr116550-2.c ?
