https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117185
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > I would suggest to change reload_in_progress || lra_in_progress back to
> > just reload_in_progress for resolve_reload_operand - this code can't work
> > for LRA.
>
> OK, I'll give it a try.
It fails in get_unaligned_address() now:
during RTL pass: reload
../../../libgomp/target.c: In function 'gomp_map_vars_existing':
checking for unistd.h... ../../../libgomp/target.c:661:1: internal compiler
error: in get_unaligned_address, at config/alpha/alpha.cc:1577
661 | }
| ^
yes
mv -f .deps/oacc-mem.Tpo .deps/oacc-mem.Plo
checking for dlfcn.h... 0x1232b5033 internal_error(char const*, ...)
../../gcc/diagnostic-global-context.cc:517
0x1232676d7 fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*)
../../gcc/diagnostic.cc:1533
0x121f528bf get_unaligned_address(rtx_def*)
../../gcc/config/alpha/alpha.cc:1577
0x121f55e03 alpha_expand_mov_nobwx(machine_mode, rtx_def**)
../../gcc/config/alpha/alpha.cc:2346
0x122c4f6c3 gen_movqi(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
../../gcc/config/alpha/alpha.md:4241
0x120bd8057 rtx_insn* insn_gen_fn::operator()<rtx_def*, rtx_def*>(rtx_def*,
rtx_def*) const
../../gcc/recog.h:442
0x120eb866f emit_move_insn_1(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
../../gcc/expr.cc:4577
0x120eb9747 emit_move_insn(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
../../gcc/expr.cc:4747
0x12137c6bb lra_emit_move(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
../../gcc/lra.cc:509
0x1213a523b curr_insn_transform
../../gcc/lra-constraints.cc:4750
0x1213a8ed7 lra_constraints(bool)
../../gcc/lra-constraints.cc:5496
0x121384443 lra(_IO_FILE*, int)
../../gcc/lra.cc:2445
0x1212fa08f do_reload
../../gcc/ira.cc:5977
0x1212fa9a7 execute
../../gcc/ira.cc:6165
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
Is that another case which should be reload-only?
