https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99997
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |59660
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> I suspect if we do something about:
> # iftmp.0_8 = PHI <0(3), 1(4)>
> _9 = (_Bool) iftmp.0_8;
>
>
> First things might just work. Let me look into that. Plus there might be an
> expand issue ...
PR 59660 has the same issue there.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
[Bug 59660] We fail to optimize common boolean checks pre-inlining
