https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83464

--- Comment #9 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot 
fu-berlin.de> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #8)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #5)
> > > I'm not sure this is an acceptable solution.  It disables various other
> > > optimizations and reduces in worse code than normally should be.  When you
> > > rebuild all of debian with LRA enabled, please make sure to take out any
> > > such hacks.
> > 
> > It's not a solution, it was a work-around.
> > 
> > FWIW, I have tried to build the package with the gcc-10 package from Debian
> > (which is a recent snapshot) and -mlra, but so far cmake doesn't want to
> > accept gcc-10 as the build compiler when set with export CC/CXX, so I have
> > to poke around what the problem is.
> > 
> > I will report back once I have a result.
> 
> Adrian, could you please re-check this issue with latest version of
> https://github.com/olegendo/gcc/tree/devel/sh-lra ?

I just gave it a quick try and I can no longer reproduce the issue. qtwebkit
builds fine with a LRA-enabled gcc-15 using Kaz' sh-lra-take3 branch.
  • [Bug target/83464] [SH] I... olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
    • [Bug target/83464] [... glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to