https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70989
Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=58517
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've seen a similar thing recently w.r.t. use of standard patterns like min,
max and clamp, which usually fall back to conditional branches. Perhaps those
standard name patterns should be implemented if zero-displacement conditional
branches are enabled, like it's already done for "abs<mode>2".
